Google and Flex?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by John Barrett on February 17, 2009 at 9:06pm

Hi Daniel,
I think that you can include meta tags in your flex app using [Bindable]. However, since flex is a swf file on the server(along with other assets), this might do not do the trick. bindable does include a meta tags, along with many others. I actually never thought about this, as I only flex for fun.
Check the docs here:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/201/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/...

Maybe I will look into this more,and write about it on my blog. Can I post code here?
My blog is at:
http://blog.meleana.info, I just started it, so not much there.

Is erached Google and found:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aweblogs.macromedia.com+inurl%...

Johnny

Permalink Reply by Daniel Leuck on February 17, 2009 at 9:25pm

Hi John. I think my post was a bit ambiguous. This was intended as a strategy question, perhaps better worded as, "Why is Google ignoring Flex as a platform." In other words, why are they almost exclusively AJAX oriented in terms of their applications and frameworks.

re: Posting code
Yes, you are welcome to post code. The FAQ explains the best way to do this.
John Barrett said:

Hi Daniel,
I think that you can include meta tags in your flex app using [Bindable]. However, since flex is a swf file on the server(along with other assets), this might do not do the trick. bindable does include a meta tags, along with many others. I actually never thought about this, as I only flex for fun. Check the docs here: http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/201/html/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/...
Maybe I will look into this more,and write about it on my blog. Can I post code here?
My blog is at:
http://blog.meleana.info, I just started it, so not much there.

Is erached Google and found:
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aweblogs.macromedia.com+inurl%...

Johnny