TechHui

Hawaiʻi's Technology Community

When discussing why I use Linux, I focus on the freedoms I enjoy as a user.  The flip side is what you CAN'T do when using a Mac or Windows OS.

 

For example, I tried using a MacBook Pro and dual booting OSX and Ubuntu a few years ago.  The hardware was sleek and pretty, but I quit using it because I could not:

  • Use a real docking station (3rd party port replicators, imho, aren't good enough), or
  • Use dual external monitors without adding extra hardware to drive them
    • (yeah, I know the new thunderbolt monitors can daisy chain, but who wants to spend $999 on a monitor when I could get it under $300 with HDMI?)
  • Boot from a USB flashdrive... I actually need to do that sometimes
I'd love to hear what others have experienced in the "can't do" category with Mac and Windows

Views: 296

Replies to This Discussion

Last I looked, you couldn't create symbolic or hard links to files on Windows.

 

Used to complain that you could only resize windows on a Mac desktop by grabbing the lower right corner, but that seems to have changed on Lion to become more like Linux.

 

I also used to complain about lack of multiple desktop support in OS X, but that has changed recently, but in a way that is much less usable than Linux if you have more than just a few desktops defined.  Apple seems to have a linear mindset, so desktops are all to the right or left of each other.

 

In the same way, the Mac dock is a linear list that has relatively recently been enhanced to allow you to include folders. Same with this new Lion Launchpad that is a set of left-right pages of launch buttons.  It doesn't scale as well as the cascading menus in Gnome or KDE.  I noticed with horror that the latest version of Ubuntu defaults to this Unity thing that is like a copy of the Apple dock.  

Contrary to popular belief, NTFS (the Windows filesystem since Windows NT) supports both hard and symbolic links. Hard links were added for POSIX compliance.

Although I find OS X generally provides a more polished user experience than any of the Linux options, there are a few notable exceptions. As John correctly points out, OS X is less flexible in the desktop views / multiple desktops area. Linux has always led in this area.

* One thing I have been able to do is mount iso images directly by command line.  This is kind of handy when retrieving files from a CD/DVD image.  In windows, you would have to use a program like virtualCD. 

* If you are using Gnome desktop, you can burn iso images to a blank CD from the file manager.  This is good when you download an iso image and need to burn is quickly to a blank disc.

 

* Also being able to mount external hard drives, ntfs, fat32, etc.  I have not tried an hfs (Mac) created drive though.

* Use of shared keys between systems when using secure shell.  Great when administering servers.

* Setting of permissions across files/folders by command line.  (you can do this mac too!)

Linux/Unix has some good command line tools.

I was just backing up my wife's files from an HFSplus external drive last night.  Not sure about write support, but it reads fine from Ubuntu 11.10

RSS

Sponsors

web design, web development, localization

© 2024   Created by Daniel Leuck.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service