As a long-time coder, I've always favored writing "internal website links" as paths relative to the Website's Root (a href="/some_path/target.html"), rather than fully-declared URLs (a href="http://www.myhost.com/some_path/target.html").
I've coded websites with internal links this way for years, as it makes the site much more portable across multiple hostnames. It's also been particularly handy with HTML editors like Dreamweaver to reuse boilerplate modules or snippets.
I've been pondering a change to such coding habits, in light of the web industry's aggressive emphasis on SEO, and I'm curious about your thoughts as to how links could affect SEO scoring.
Would the Search Engine Giants like Google, Yahoo, or Bing really care much about "internal website links" being generated as full URLs or Relative Paths?
.. and along the same lines, would they reward or penalize websites that had "internal website links" as a mish-mashed mixture of URLs rooted in multiple hostnames, like "myhost.com", "www.myhost.com", and "www2.myhost.com" if all those domains are essentially mirrors of the same content?
Tags: linking, seo
Share
Facebook
-
▶ Reply to This